Gender differences in pain perception among burning mouth syndrome patients: a cross-sectional study of 242 men and 242 women.

Several orofacial painful conditions are influenced by gender-related factors, but no studies are available with regard to Burning Mouth Syndrome (BMS). The present study aimed at investigating gender differences among BMS patients and their influence on pain perception. 242 BMS males (BMSm) and 242 BMS females (BMSf) matched for age were consecutively enrolled. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were recorded and the numeric rating scale (NRS), the Total Pain Rating Index (T-PRI), the Hamilton rating scale for anxiety and depression (HAM-A, HAM-D), the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) and the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) were administered. The BMSm presented statistically significant higher levels of education and rate of employment compared to the BMSf (p-values: 0.001**). Moreover, the BMSm were greater consumers of alcohol and had a higher BMI than the BMSf (p-values: < 0.001**, 0.034*). With respect to systemic comorbidities, cardiovascular diseases were statistically more prevalent among the BMSm, while hypothyroidism was more frequent in the BMSf (p-vales: < 0.001**). No differences were noted between the two groups in terms of oral symptoms and in the median scores of NRS, T-PRI, HAM-A, HAM-D, PSQI and ESS. Interestingly, the multivariate regression analysis revealed that, while anxiety, high BMI, poor sleep and high level of T-PRI were correlated to the intensity of pain (NRS) in both groups, low education was additional predictor of pain in BMSf. Further, depression, alcohol and intensity of pain were factors positively associated to the quality of pain (T-PRI) in the BMSm, whereas low education, non-married status and NRS were correlated to the T-PRI, in the BMSf. Surprisingly, smoking was inversely correlated to the intensity of pain and quality of pain respectively in BMSf and BMSm. Sociodemographic and risk factors were found to differently influence pain perception in BMSm and BMSf. Therefore, clinicians should take into account gender differences in the assessment of BMS patients to better tailor the overall pain management.

Clinical and epidemiological profile of burning mouth syndrome patients following the International Headache Society classification: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to determine the clinical and epidemiologic profile of patients with burning mouth syndrome (BMS) following the current classification of the International Headache Society (IHS)-the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3) and the International Classification of Orofacial Pain (ICOP). STUDY DESIGN: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist and involved a comprehensive search on PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, LILACS, and the gray literature. RESULTS: Of the 4,252 studies identified, 41 were included. In general, there were no differences between the clinical and epidemiologic profiles of patients with BMS classified based on ICHD-3 or ICOP. Studies were pooled in meta-analyses and showed a significant prevalence of female patients between the sixth and seventh decade of life. The burning sensation and the tongue were the most prevalent descriptors and affected location. Significant associations were demonstrated between BMS and anxiety (P = .0006), depression (P = .004), and poor oral hygiene (P = .00001). CONCLUSIONS: Under the existing contemporary classification systems, patients with BMS were found to be mostly females in the sixth and seventh decade of life with a burning sensation on the tongue. Experiencing depression and anxiety was a commonly existing comorbidity.

Non-Communicable Diseases and Associated Risk Factors in Burning Mouth Syndrome Patients.

Background and Objectives: Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) are a group of non-transmissible conditions that tend to be of long duration and are the result of a combination of genetic, physiological, environmental, and behavioral factors. Although an association between oral disorders and NCDs has been suggested, the relationship between Burning Mouth Syndrome (BMS) and NCDs and their associated risk factors has not been deeply investigated. In this study, we aim to identify associations between BMS and NCDs in the Romanian population. Materials and Methods: Ninety-nine BMS patients and 88 age-matched controls (aged 50 and over) were clinically evaluated for the presence of eight noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) and their most common risk factors, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, and obesity. Results: The results of our study showed that the BMS in the Romanian population seems to be significantly associated with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) (p < 0.001) and two of their risk factors, hypertension (p < 0.001) and dyslipidemia (p < 0.001). Moreover, evaluating the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) in the individuals not affected by CVDs (73 CTRL and 38 BMS), we found that 13.2% of BMS patients reported a moderate risk of developing CVDs in ten years, compared to the controls, all of whom presented a low risk (p = 0.002). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that a multidisciplinary clinical approach, which also includes a cardiovascular evaluation, is essential for the successful management of BMS. Moreover, these data highlighted the importance of introducing an integrated strategy for the prevention and care of NCDs in BMS patients.

Burning Mouth Syndrome and Hypertension: Prevalence, Gender Differences and Association with Pain and Psycho-Social Characteristics-A Case Control Study.

BACKGROUND: To assess the prevalence of hypertension (HTN) in burning mouth syndrome (BMS) patients and to investigate its relationship with sociodemographic factors, pain and the psychological profile. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted by enrolling 242 BMS patients and 242 controls matched for age and gender. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were recorded, and all participants completed numeric rating scale (NRS), the short-form of the McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ), the Hamilton rating scale for anxiety and depression (HAM-A, HAM-D), the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) and the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS). RESULTS: The BMS patients presented with a statistically significant higher prevalence of HTN compared to that in the controls (55% versus 33.5%; p-value: <0.001) and higher median scores of the NRS, SF-MPQ, HAM-A, HAM-D, PSQI and ESS (p < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis in the BMS patients indicated positive correlations between HTN and age, systemic diseases, drug consumption and anxiety (p-value: <0.001) and these predictors were responsible for 11.3% of the HTN variance in the BMS patients, when considered together. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HTN was significantly higher in the BMS patients, since ageing, the presence of comorbidities, drug consumption and anxiety were potential predictors. Further studies are needed to better investigate the relationship between BMS and HTN.

The association of sleep disturbances with burning mouth syndrome: An overlooked relationship-A qualitative systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To review the relevant literature to assess whether patients with burning mouth syndrome (BMS) are more prone to have sleep disturbances than general population. METHODS: The literature search for relevant articles was from July 2020 to March 2021. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane library, Dentistry & Oral Sciences Source, and Scopus was conducted to search for relevant studies. The quality of studies was assessed in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute's guidelines and using the software SUMARI-The System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information. Confidence in the findings was assessed using the GRADE-CERQual approach. RESULTS: A total of 1064 studies were initially identified from the search; six studies, two cross-sectional and four case-control, met the inclusion criteria and were selected for this systematic review. Sleep disturbances were a required outcome measured in selected studies evaluating symptoms of BMS. For studies that were included in the final analyses, BMS was found to relate to several dimensions of sleep including sleep disturbance and duration (n = 6), sleep affecting daytime function (n = 4), sleep quality (n = 6), sleep efficiency (n = 4), and ability to fall asleep (n = 4). Consistent evidence of moderate confidence found that BMS was associated with greater sleep disturbance, reduced sleep quality, increased time taken to fall asleep, reduced sleep efficiency, and poor daytime function, whereas evidence of low confidence was found regarding the association of BMS with reduced sleep duration. CONCLUSIONS: Although the presented studies could not establish a direct causal relationship between BMS and sleep disturbances, it supports the evidence that sleep disturbance is associated with symptoms of BMS. Management strategies to improve sleep may be considered in future research for managing BMS patients.

Prevalencia de glosodinia. Síndrome de boca ardiente y factores de riesgo asociados en la población de Ciudad Real / Prevalence of glossodynia. Burning mouth syndrome and associated risk factors in the population of Ciudad Real

Objetivo: Conocer la prevalencia real del síndrome de boca ardiente (SBA) y los posibles factores de riesgo asociados.Material y métodos: Estudio observacional descriptivo transversal, de base poblacional con selección aleatoria simple en mayores de 24 años. Tras muestreo aleatorio, el año 2015 se contactó telefónicamente identificando pacientes que cumplían criterios de inclusión. A estos se les realizó entrevista presencial, descartando presencia de lesiones orales, se realizó test de ansiedad, depresión y analítica. Se agregó una cohorte de pacientes ya diagnosticados de base de datos del Hospital de Ciudad Real de Dermatología, para analizar los posibles factores de riesgo asociados comparando con un grupo control. Las características de los pacientes con SBA y los controles sin SBA se analizaron estadísticamente con el SPSS v 21 y se utilizaron la prueba de Chi cuadrado y el Odds Ratio (OR) para evaluar las diferencias en las características de losgrupos. La significación estadística se fijó en p < 0,05.Resultados: La prevalencia fue de 0,84 % (IC 95 %: 0,28-1,4). Los factores que alcanzaron significación estadística en el desarrollo de SBA fueron los siguientes: el sexo femenino p < 0,05 (IC 1,43-2,20), antecedentes de ansiedad p < 0,05 (IC 6,4-72,47), depresión p < 0,05 (IC 3,59-34,40 ), de candidiasis oral p < 0,05 (IC 1,44-16,27), de déficit nutricional p < 0,05 (IC 4,1-100,05), miedo al cáncer p < 0,05 (IC 1-1,36), hipotiroidismo p < 0,005 (IC 1,06-31,48) y uso de prótesis dentales p < 0,05 (IC 1,06-32,48). La toma de antidepresivos p < 0,05 (IC 7,28-177,86) y ansiolíticos p < 0,05 (IC 7,56-99,67). La presencia de sequedad bucal subjetiva p < 0,05 (IC 1,81-17,94) y objetiva p < 0,05 (IC 1,47-14,57). Tener alterados los cuestionario de ansiedad p < 0,05 (IC 10,64-183,29) y depresión p < 0,05 (IC: 5,48-132,92).(AU)

Objective: To know the real prevalence of burning mouth syndrome (BAS) and the possible associated risk factors.Material and methods: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, population-based study with simple random selection in people over 24 years of age. After showing up randomly, in 2015 a telephone call was made to identify patients who met the inclusion criteria. They underwent a face-to-face interview, ruling out the presence of oral lesions, anxiety, depression and analytical tests were performed. A cohort of patients already diagnosed from the Ciudad Real Dermatology Hospital database was added to analyze the possible associated risk factors compared with a control group. Characteristics of BMS patients and non-ABS controls were statistically analyzed with SPSS v 21 and chi-square test and Odds Ratio (OR) were used to assess differences in group characteristics. Significance statistic was set at p < 0.05.Results: The prevalence was 0.84 % (95 % CI 0.28-1.4). The factors that reached statistical significance in the development of BMS were the following: female sex p < 0.05 (CI 1.43-2.20), history of anxiety p < 0.05 (CI 6.4-72.47) depression p < 0.05 (CI 3.-34.40), oral candidiasis p < 0.05 (CI 1.44-16.27); and nutritional deficit p < 0.05 (CI 4.1-100.05); fear of cancer p < 0.05 (CI 1-1.36); hypothyroidism p < 0.05 (CI 1.06-31.48) and use of dental prostheses p < 0.05 (CI 1.06-32,48). Taking antidepressants p < 0.05 CI (7.28-177.86) and anxiolytics p < 0.05 (CI 7.56-99.67). The presence of subjective dry mouth p < 0.05 (IC 1.81-17,94) and objective p < 0.05 (IC 1.47-14.57). Having altered the Anxiety Questionnaire p < 0.05 (CI 10.64-183.29); and depression p < 0.05 (CI: 5.48-132.92).(AU)

Burning mouth syndrome and Reflux Disease: relationship and clinical implications.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: An association between reflux and burning mouth syndrome (BMS) has been proposed. Aims of this study were: 1) to investigate the frequency of BMS in a sample of GERD patients; 2) to measure G17, in a sample of BMS patients; 3) to assess the efficacy of different therapeutical schedules for GERD in BMS patients. METHODS: We divided the study in 3 main steps. In step one, we analyzed 500 consecutive GERD patients' type and frequency of extraesophageal manifestations including BMS. In step two, we collected 124 consecutive BMS patients' symptoms and  G17.  In step three, we evaluate the efficacy of 3 different drugs on BMS. RESULTS: In step one, 204 patients complained heartburn; 31 globus pharyngeus; 52 chronic cough; 54 pharyngitis; 31 postnasal drip; 56 burning mouth symptoms; 34 noncardiac chest pain; 17 asthma and 21 sleep apnea. In step two, 29 patients had G17 ≤ 1 pg/L; 64 patients between 1 and 3; and 31 patients ≥ 3. In step three, 49 patients reported slight benefit with PPI, 75 no benefit. 61 patients reported slight benefit with sodium alginate and sodium bicarbonate, 63 no benefit. 23 reported an almost complete remission with HYCHSA, 26 slight benefit, 33 no benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of BMS in GERD patients was similar to that reported for chronic chough and pharyngitis. Low levels of G17 were found in the majority of BMS patients. Finally, we observed a greater benefit from barrier drugs therapy than from PPI therapy in BMS patients. (www.actabiomedica.it).

Candidiasis and Other Bacterial Infections among Patients Diagnosed with Burning Mouth Syndrome.

Background and Objectives: Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a state in which a patient experiences intraoral burning or a dysesthetic sensation without clinically evident causative lesions in the oropharyngeal area. The disorder is linked to a variety of conditions, including dry mouth, Candida, and bacterial infections. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of oral Candida and/or bacterial infections among patients with BMS and whether they have an effect on pain/burning and salivary flow levels. Objectives: (1) Gather patient data regarding the presence of oral infections, dry mouth, and pain levels in the morning, afternoon, and evening periods; (2) data analysis and assessment to determine medians, means, frequencies, correlations, and statistically significant differences between patient groups. Materials and Methods: Overall, 173 patients (23 males and 150 females) with BMS and 13 controls (five males and eight females) took part in the study. We measured pain/burning levels, unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow, the percentage of patients infected with Candida species and/or bacterial species, and the said species growth in Petri dishes. Results: Candida albicans was the most commonly found infection among patients with BMS (n = 28, 16.2%). Overall, 21.4% patients with BMS were diagnosed with either C. albicans or another Candida species. Enterobacter had the richest growth among patients with BMS (7.5% out of the infected 10.4% BMS patients). No statistical significance could be noted between the existence of either Candida species or bacterial species infections and changes in pain/burning and salivary flow levels. Negative correlations were noted between age and unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow, and positive correlations were noted between age and Candida andspecific bacteria species' growth levels. Conclusions: Although patients with present bacterial or Candida infections showed a marginal increase in pain/burning levels, no direct statistically significant associations could be made between the presence of Candida species or other bacteria and the symptoms among patients with BMS.

Burning Mouth Syndrome Etiology: A Narrative Review.

Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is defined as "idiopathic orofacial pain with intraoral burning or dysesthesia recurring daily for more than 2 hours per day and more than 3 months, without any identifiable causative lesions, with or without somatosensory changes" in International Classification of Orofacial Pain, 2020. Worldwide prevalence of BMS was estimated to be 1.73% in population-based studies, while female and elderly are at higher risk of BMS. The aim of this narrative review is to clarify the main etiopathogenetic factors of BMS investigated so far in the scientific literature. There is growing evidence of an important role of peripheral neuropathology in BMS, supported by immunohistochemical studies which have demonstrated a significant loss of epithelial and subepithelial nerve fibers. Other possible etiopathogenetic factors emerging from literature are laryngopharyngeal reflux and hormonal and salivary changes related to aging and menopause. Finally, the role of the oral microbiota in BMS has not yet been thoroughly investigated. Further studies are necessary to investigate the probably multifactorial etiopathogenesis of primary BMS, a pathology which has a serious impact on the quality of life of our patients, a disease we find ourselves treating without the adequate therapy and the necessary knowledge.

Glossodynia, burning mouth syndrome, and COVID-19.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the prevalence of glossodynia increased among patients affected by COVID-19 compared to other hospital populations. METHODS: The i2b2 patient registry platform at the University of Florida Health Center was used to generate a count of patients using the international classification of diseases (ICD)-10 diagnosis codes from October 2015 to June 2021. Logistic regression of the aggregates was used for analysis. RESULTS: Of the patients with both glossodynia and COVID-19, 60% were females, 32% were African American, 64% were white, and 100% were adults. There were 72% females, 19% African Americans, 72% whites, and 93% adults with glossodynia only. For COVID-19 patients, 57% were females, 23% were African American, 56% whites, and 90% were adults. The odds ratio (OR) for glossodynia in the COVID-19 patients was significant (OR = 2.9; 95% CI, 1.94-4.32; P < 0.0001). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Glossodynia is significantly more common in COVID-19 patients and should be considered in the differential diagnoses among the oral complications of this infection.

Síndrome de la boca ardiente: revisión de la literatura / Burning mouth syndrome: literature review

Resumen El síndrome de la boca ardiente (SBA) es una condición de dolor crónico en la cavidad oral, que se presenta mayoritariamente en mujeres de edad media. Diversas causas locales y sistémicas pueden producirlo en forma secundaria, o bien, puede representar un cuadro primario, sin etiología específica identificable. Su etiopatogenia y evolución clínica es poco comprendida. Las opciones terapéuticas son variadas y en general es necesario un tratamiento multidisciplinario. A continuación, se presenta una revisión de la literatura respecto a esta patología para difusión en nuestro medio.

Abstract Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a chronic pain condition of the oral cavity, which occurs more frequently in middle-aged women. It can be secondary to different local and systemic causes, or represent a primary condition, with no specific identifiable etiology. Its etiopathogenesis and clinical evolution are poorly understood. Therapeutic options are multiple and a multidisciplinary treatment is necessary. We present a review of the literature regarding BMS, to provide information relevant to our area of expertise.

Burning Mouth Syndrome: An Overview and Future Perspectives.

Burning Mouth Syndrome (BMS) is a complex chronic neuropathic orofacial pain disorder characterized by a generalized or localized intraoral burning, dysesthetic sensation or pain of the oral mucosa, recurring daily for more than 2 h per day for more than 3 months, without any evidence of specific mucosal lesions and/or laboratory findings [...].

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic upon patients with burning mouth syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: The global COVID-19 pandemic has caused changes in the daily life of people, with a particularly relevant impact upon certain groups of individuals that have difficulties in facing stress. A study is made of the impact of the pandemic upon patients with burning mouth syndrome (BMS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 40 patients with BMS diagnosed in the Unit of Oral Medicine (University of Murcia, Spain) were included. In all cases the study comprised a standardized clinical interview by the same professional and an exploration of the oral cavity. The first visit took place before the pandemic and consisted of the evaluation of anxiety (Hospital and Anxiety Depression Scale [HADS]), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), pain intensity (visual analog scale [VAS]) and sleep quality (Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index [PSQI]), while the second visit took place one and a half months after the start of lockdown due to the pandemic in Spain. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 36 women (90%) and four men (10%) aged between 39 and s86 years. Statistically significant differences were recorded between the two visits in terms of anxiety (p < 0.001), sleep quality (p < 0.001) and pain intensity (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The appearance of the COVID-19 pandemic has triggered worsening of anxiety, sleep quality and pain intensity in patients with BMS.

Worldwide prevalence estimates of burning mouth syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the worldwide prevalence and epidemiology profile of burning mouth syndrome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Search strategies were performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang database for studies published before January 31, 2021, for the prevalence of burning mouth syndrome. RESULTS: Eighteen articles were included. The overall pooled prevalence of burning mouth syndrome was 1.73% (95% CI = 0.176-0.351, n = 26,632) in general population, and 7.72% (95% CI = 0.434-0.691, n = 86,591) in clinical patients. The subgroup analysis by continent showed that among the population-based studies the prevalence in Asia (1.05%) lower than in Europe (5.58%) and North America (1.10%). The subgroup analysis by gender showed the prevalence of female (1.15%) was higher than male (0.38%) in general population. The subgroup analysis by age showed the prevalence was higher for people over 50 (3.31%) than under 50 (1.92%). CONCLUSIONS: The pooled prevalence of burning mouth syndrome was relatively high in both general population and clinical patients, varies in different regions with the highest prevalence in Europe, and females over 50 years were the most susceptible group. More epidemiological surveys on the prevalence of burning mouth syndrome are needed.

Clinical characterization of gingival type of burning mouth syndrome: a cross-sectional study / Caracterización clínica del síndrome de boca ardiente de tipo gingival: un estudio transversal

Background: The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of localized intraoral neuropathic pain in acluster of patients who reported the involvement of gingival site as only clinical manifestation of dysesthesia,analysing type and distribution of symptoms.Material and Methods: Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) patients were enrolled in the study. Patients werescreened through laboratory test and a conventional oral examination with periodontal chart. A questionnaire tocollect data on symptoms, oral site involved, quality of sleep, anxiety was submitted to all the patients.Results: A total of 236 patients were recruited. Seventy-six patients (32.2%) presented generalized type, whereas160 (67.8%) had localized type. In the localized BMS group, the gingiva was involved in 70 patients and in 33 ofthese it was the only site involved. In the gingival subgroup, 35 patients reported burning, 29 pain and 24 xero-stomia.Conclusions: To best our knowledge, this study is the first that analyses gingival involvement as the only site inBMS and it could encourage further investigations to understand the etiopathogenesis of gingival BMS.(AU)

Clinical characterization of gingival type of burning mouth syndrome: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of localized intraoral neuropathic pain in a cluster of patients who reported the involvement of gingival site as only clinical manifestation of dysesthesia, analysing type and distribution of symptoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) patients were enrolled in the study. Patients were screened through laboratory test and a conventional oral examination with periodontal chart. A questionnaire to collect data on symptoms, oral site involved, quality of sleep, anxiety was submitted to all the patients. RESULTS: A total of 236 patients were recruited. Seventy-six patients (32.2%) presented generalized type, whereas 160 (67.8%) had localized type. In the localized BMS group, the gingiva was involved in 70 patients and in 33 of these it was the only site involved. In the gingival subgroup, 35 patients reported burning, 29 pain and 24 xerostomia. CONCLUSIONS: To best our knowledge, this study is the first that analyses gingival involvement as the only site in BMS and it could encourage further investigations to understand the etiopathogenesis of gingival BMS.

Association of anxiety, depression, and stress with burning mouth syndrome: a case-control study.

Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a painful disorder characterized by severe burning in the oral cavity in the absence of clinical signs. In this case-control study, 60 patients were allocated to 3 groups: patients with BMS, patients with benign changes in the oral cavity (anxiety [positive] control group), or healthy patients (negative control group). A visual analog scale (VAS), Beck Anxiety and Depression inventories, Lipp Stress Symptoms Inventory, Xerostomia Inventory-Dutch Version, and a BMS questionnaire were used. Statistical analyses (P < 0.05) were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn post hoc, Pearson chi-square, Fisher exact, and multinomial logistic regression tests. Most of the patients were female. The BMS group had more patients who were older than 60 years (P = 0.008), more patients with high VAS scores (P < 0.001), and more patients with moderate or severe anxiety (P < 0.001) and depression (P < 0.001) than the 2 control groups. Patients in the BMS group also had higher rates of stress during the alarm (P = 0.003), resistance (P < 0.001), and exhaustion phases (P < 0.001). All patients with BMS reported burning and xerostomia, 90% reported a feeling of dry mouth, and 80% reported a change in taste; these values were significantly higher than those in the control groups (P < 0.001). Anxiety was independently associated with a 123.80 times greater risk of having BMS (P = 0.004). Psychological factors are directly associated with BMS, and anxiety is the most important of these factor.

Anemia, hematinic deficiencies, and hyperhomocysteinemia in gastric parietal cell antibody-positive and -negative burning mouth syndrome patients.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Our previous study found the serum gastric parietal cell antibody (GPCA) positivity in 12.3% of burning mouth syndrome (BMS) patients. This study assessed whether GPCA-positive BMS (GPCA+BMS) patients had significantly higher frequencies of macrocytosis, anemia, hematinic deficiencies, and hyperhomocysteinemia than healthy control subjects or GPCA-negative BMS (GPCA-BMS) patients. METHODS: The mean corpuscular volume, blood hemoglobin (Hb), and serum iron, vitamin B12, folic acid, homocysteine, and GPCA levels were measured and compared between any two of three groups of 109 GPCA+BMS patients, 775 GPCA-BMS patients, and 442 healthy control subjects. RESULTS: We found that 109 GPCA+BMS patients had significantly higher frequencies of macrocytosis, blood Hb and serum iron and vitamin B12 deficiencies, and hyperhomocysteinemia than 442 healthy control subjects (all P-values < 0.001) and significantly higher frequencies of macrocytosis, blood Hb and serum vitamin B12 deficiencies, and hyperhomocysteinemia than 775 GPCA-BMS patients (all P-values < 0.01). Moreover, 775 GPCA-BMS patients had significantly higher frequencies of macrocytosis, blood Hb and serum iron, vitamin B12, and folic acid deficiencies, and hyperhomocysteinemia than 442 healthy control subjects (all P-values < 0.005). Pernicious anemia (45.5%) and normocytic anemia (24.2%) were the two most common types of anemia in 33 anemic GPCA+BMS patients. Moreover, normocytic anemia (61.3%), thalassemia trait-induced anemia (15.5%), and iron deficiency anemia (14.1%) were the three most common types of anemia in 142 anemic GPCA-BMS patients. CONCLUSION: GPCA+BMS patients have significantly higher frequencies of macrocytosis, blood Hb and serum vitamin B12 deficiencies, and hyperhomocysteinemia than healthy control subjects or GPCA-BMS patients.

Association Between Burning Mouth Syndrome and the Development of Depression, Anxiety, Dementia, and Parkinson Disease.

Importance: Burning mouth syndrome is a chronic oral pain disorder that is characterized by a generalized or localized burning sensation without the presence of any specific mucosal lesions. It remains unclear, however, whether burning mouth syndrome is associated with the development of psychoneurological conditions among patients with the syndrome. Objective: To evaluate the risk of developing psychoneurological conditions, including depression, anxiety, dementia, and Parkinson disease, in patients with burning mouth syndrome. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using a nationwide representative cohort sample from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort, which consists of data from approximately 1 million patients in South Korea. The study included 586 patients with burning mouth syndrome (patient group) and 1172 individuals without burning mouth syndrome (comparison group). The patient group included all patients who received inpatient and outpatient care for an initial diagnosis of burning mouth syndrome between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2012. The comparison group was selected (2 individuals without burning mouth syndrome for each patient with burning mouth syndrome) using propensity score matching for sex, age, location of residence, household income level, and comorbidities. Data were collected and analyzed from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2013. Main Outcomes and Measures: Death and the incidence of psychopathological diseases. Affective disorder events that occurred among participants during the follow-up period were investigated using survival analysis, a log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate the incidence rates, survival rates, and hazard ratios, respectively, of participants who developed psychoneurological conditions. Results: Of 1758 total participants, 1086 (61.8%) were female; 701 participants (39.9%) were younger than 45 years, 667 (37.9%) were aged 45 to 64 years, and 390 (22.2%) were older than 64 years. The overall incidence of depression and anxiety was higher in patients with burning mouth syndrome (n = 586; 30.8 incidents and 44.2 incidents per 1000 person-years, respectively) than in individuals without burning mouth syndrome (n = 1172; 11.7 incidents and 19.0 incidents per 1000 person-years, respectively). The results also indicated a similar incidence of dementia and Parkinson disease between the patient group (6.5 incidents and 2.5 incidents per 1000 person-years, respectively) and the comparison group (4.9 incidents and 1.7 incidents per 1000 person-years, respectively). After adjusting for sociodemographic factors (age, location of residence, household income level, and comorbidities), the adjusted hazard ratios for the development of depression and anxiety among patients with burning mouth syndrome were 2.77 (95% CI, 2.22-3.45) and 2.42 (95% CI, 2.02-2.90), respectively. However, no association was found between burning mouth syndrome and the risk of developing dementia and Parkinson disease. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this observational study suggest that burning mouth syndrome is associated with increases in the incidence of depression and anxiety but not in the incidence of dementia and Parkinson disease among patients with the syndrome. Clinicians should be aware of this association and be prepared to make referrals to appropriate mental health care professionals.